Search results for query: *

Oh oops, I forgot. I strictly meant lava damage, not fire damage, and it can be set in an UDMF map. You can download Ultimate Zone Builder (has UDMF support, unlike base Zone Builder) here: https://mb.srb2.org/addons/ultimate-zone-builder.6126/

You should give it a try. It seems that FOFs marked to deal lava damage can harm players that touch the walls.

No. I'm not interested. I'm just curious about why, despite claiming you're avoiding it, you keep coming here to complain about it. You can just leave at any time. Click here to exit the thread.

I checked. It says Freedom Planet. ...are your unexplained reasons regarding this? If yes... then why are you here?

No shit. I don't get it - If you're not going to explain your stance, then why would you post something like this?

but you didn't ramble at all, you just said "it's still the wrong thing" with no context whatsoever :oh:

if it plays good then i don't care 🤷‍♂️

No. Also wrong terminology. Does it matter if it is or not?

After @KirbyDL's message I figured I'd check the source code to see WHEN do rings get killed off. Rings only melt if the FOF is swimmable and it has the fire or lava damage type. Therefore, you can totally do this, no problem. Just don't make the solid FOF a water FOF and you're good to go!

...= P_PlayerTouchingSectorSpecial(player, 3, 10) if isTouchingFunny then if player.mo then player.mo.momz = 99*FRACUNIT -- ascend to heaven end end end) This only works on binary maps, since the UDMF editor deprecated the sector specials in favor of...

Natively you can't create new sector types or linedef actions (i mean it in terms of doing something like freeslotting them), but you can totally use Lua to check for a specific sector/linedef special number that doesn't correspond to any existing special effect and act upon it.

It's not an opinion if it consists on just "it's still the wrong thing" compounding on a previous non-issue. An opinion is more elaborate than this. It's not fair either.

yeah i literally said that edit: sorry, misread. i thought it was an hypothetical lol

Something in particular that happened years ago can't be a ban reason - it happened way long ago. But it can be a supporting reason for your removal. Think about it: If your whole two year history is about talking shit, and people get tired of you talking shit, if you keep talking shit then...

Welcome to the board. The typo correction was intended to be a simple correction, not as a zinger or something to support my reply. That's not a smug emote. I intended to express concern. I get what you mean though. I try to be assertive to avoid going in loops, but sometimes I go...

A snarky remark, unprompted, coming from the guy that is known for being obsessively rude, is rude. It's not a matter of having a different material for skin, it's about not being an asshole for no reason in the first place. No moderator worth their salt on any community is going to tolerate a...

HOW ARE THEY LONG REACHES??? The first one is about admins. That doesn't really make it any better? It's still throwing flak for no reason at all. The second one MAY have been advice if it weren't followed by the rude The SRB2 community is merely reaping what it sowed remark, as if we did...

...if you don't understand why users around you have an issue with how things are delivered, then joining such a thread is not a bright idea to have? *attitude I am not giving you attitude. I am telling you that you are giving me a point that is completely unrelated to my point, and to chalk...

then do Your response does not make contextual sense. I literally have no idea what do you want me to do with something unrelated to my point.

Okay, fine, it's a rude remark to admins. Would you have preferred this rude remark to the community instead?